It is a commonplace in theologically liberal circles to downplay the cross, to say, as Adolf
von Harnack did, that the gospel is all about the fatherhood of God, the brotherhood of man, and the
infinite value of the human soul, with little reference to the atonement. In nineteenth century
England, the Quaker Liberal politician, John Bright, was supposed to have murmured about
evangelicals: ‘The atonement, always the atonement! Have they nothing else to say?’
Matthew, Mark and Luke are often thought to say little about Christ’s death for sinners. Such
a statement could only come from one who had not read them. Mark’s Gospel, for example, has
famously been described by Martin Kähler as ‘a passion narrative with an extended introduction’.
This is because around one third of the gospel is devoted to the Passion story – which is also true of
Matthew and Luke. There is a major dividing point in the Gospel in Mark 8, where Jesus asks: ‘Who
do people say that I am?’ (Mark 8:27) After speaking of the person of Jesus – He is the Christ –
Mark goes on to tell of Jesus’ declaration that as the Son of Man He would suffer many things, be
killed, and after three days rise again (Mark 29-32). This deals with the work of Christ, what He
came to do.
Christ never speaks of Himself simply as an inspired teacher. The Son of Man is the king in
God’s everlasting kingdom (Dan.7:13-14), and He came to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark
10:45). His death would pay the price of sin. At the Last Supper, Jesus took the cup and said: ‘This is
My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many’ (Mark 14:24). This is not the language of
teaching and miracle-working but of blood and sacrifice, and of sins being paid for.
John’s Gospel is different to the Synoptics, but the message is the same. John has 21 chapters,
but some 50% of the Gospel deals with the immediate lead-up to Jesus’ crucifixion, and His
subsequent resurrection (John 11-21). All through the Gospel there are reference to the Lord’s
Passion. John the Baptist recognised the Messiah as ‘the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the
world!’ (John 1:29, 36) As Isaac Watts put it:
Not all the blood of beasts,
On Jewish altars slain,
Could give the guilty conscience peace
Or wash away the stain.
But Christ, the heavenly Lamb
Takes all our sins away;
A sacrifice of nobler name,
And richer blood than they.
Jesus is the fulfilment of the Old Testament sacrificial system.
In addition, Christ fulfils that strange incident recorded in Numbers 21:4-9 where Moses lifts
up a bronze serpent, and all who look upon that serpent are healed from the poison of serpents. As
Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so the Son of Man will be lifted up on the cross, that
those who look on Him will be saved (John 3:14). In the temple the Old Testament sacrifices were
offered to God but Jesus’ body becomes the true temple where the one final sacrifice is offered (John
As a shepherd, David had to risk his life against bears and lions which came after the sheep,
looking for a meal (1 Sam.17:34-37). However, Jesus does far more than that. He is the good
shepherd who does not just risk His life for the sheep but gives His life for them (John 10:11, 17-18).
He has authority to lay down His life and He has authority to take it up again. The whole purpose of
His life was not to escape death but to embrace it for the sake of His sheep, and to give them new
life. To use another image, His death would be like the dying of a grain of wheat in the earth, which
then bears fruit (John 12:24). In paying for the sins of His chosen people, Jesus could cry on the
cross: ‘It is finished’ (John 19:30) – which is one word in Greek. Most fittingly, Martin Luther
proclaimed: ‘In this word, “It is finished,” will I comfort myself. I am forced to confess that all my
finishing of the will of God is imperfect, piecemeal work, while yet the law urges on me that not so
much as one tittle of it must remain unaccomplished. Christ is the end of the law. What it requires,
Christ has performed.’
The apostle Paul is said by some to have distorted the gospel by explaining the death of
Christ in terms of substitutionary atonement. Actually, he was only echoing the message of the
Gospels. The Gospels themselves tell of Jesus’ cross of sacrifice and atonement, and the message of
His death to win our life.